WhiteCoat Rants

Random thoughts about US Healthcare

The Business Model Of Medicine – Part 2

Posted by WhiteCoat on March 21, 2008

In response to my rant about a lack of primary physicians on Kevin’s blog, a couple of people decided to come over here to play.

One was The Hospital Pharmacist, who left the comment below on my post. I was initially going to respond in the comments section, but I want everyone to read and digest what I have to say. I think it is that important.

The Hospital Pharmacist stated:
Well, no one is forcing the physicians to sign the third party contracts, just as no one forces the retail pharmacists to sign them either. I know many retail pharmacists that have dropped third party plans and are doing quite well.
I believe there is a market out there for cash-only physicians as well. But I’m sure it would be scary to take that leap.

My response:
While pharmacists and physicians may cater to the same customers, they are two very different business models. Pharmacists are retailers. They sell goods – medications, health care products, birthday cards. Physicians sell services. Your analogies between the two business models won’t work.

On an esoteric level, you are probably right. Just like no one forces people to pay taxes and no one forces you to drive safely, no one holds a gun to a physicians’ heads and forces them to sign these third party agreements. On a practical level, you are just as wrong as Mr. Economist.

For example, emergency physicians work in emergency departments. Emergency departments are contained within hospitals. Part of every hospital service agreement is the requirement that the emergency physicians working within the hospital must agree to accept Medicare, Medicaid, CHAMPUS, etc. If you don’t sign the third party contracts, you don’t have a job. So we technically don’t have to agree to sign the third party contracts, but then we technically wouldn’t have a job, either.

Then again, hospitals might be able to make the “business decision” to stop caring for Medicaid patients. Then look what can happen.

There is a large difference between “cash only” pharmacies and “cash only” physicians. Here are a few examples:

  1. Pharmacists can refuse to give medications to patients that don’t have the ability to pay. Emergency department physicians cannot (and probably would not even if they could).
  2. As more and more of the public learns that the generic medications are generally just as effective as their high-priced counterparts and they refuse to pay exorbitant prices for designer medications, there are few members of the public who wouldn’t be able to afford to pay $4 per generic prescription out of their pockets.
  3. What’s going to happen if emergency departments become “cash only”? How are you going to pay $15,000 for your chest pain work up? “Will that be cash or credit? Gee, sir, your credit card was denied. Guess you’ll have to just take this $5 aspirin and keep your fingers crossed. Do you have exact change? Have a nice day.”
  4. What about invasive cardiologists going “cash only”? You don’t get your stent placed until you front the cash? “I know you’re in the throes of death from your acute anterolateral MI, Ms. Peel, but business decisions are business decisions. Sorry.”
  5. Oooh. How about diagnostic radiologists as cash only? “I know what’s wrong with you and I’m not tellin’ till you paaaay me. Nyah nyah.”

All doctors can go “cash only”? Stop being ridiculous.

But you’re right that there is a subset of physicians that can choose to go “cash only.” Those who are able to use the cash only model are slowly migrating to that business model.

Watch what happens with the next set of Medicare cuts. There will be a large attrition of physicians from the Medicare system. Some will just leave practice altogether due to the bureaucratic nightmares of practicing medicine. Others will probably get fed up and go “cash only.” Here’s a news flash. Most patients would rather pay nothing for medical care than pay a retainer fee for a doctor that knows them. Why do you think there is a constant flux of patients every time an employer changes insurance plans?

Baby boomers are just hitting Medicare age. More patients needing Medicare, less physicians will be willing to provide services under Medicare. Sounds like a stable system to me. I actually WANT the Medicare cuts to happen. Stop rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Cut more payments to physicians. Let’s see what happens when there aren’t enough primary care physicians to care for the masses. That’s what everyone wants, isn’t it?

Now think about this: What will happen to the patients?
Those who can afford it will have excellent care by physicians who can take their time during each patient visit. My prediction is that those patients will be in the minority.
What happens to those on fixed incomes (i.e. grandma in her wheelchair living on SSI income) who get their care from the Medicare National Bank? They aren’t going to be able to afford to see the physicians on retainer. Where will they go? To the hospital where every American is guaranteed to receive care. Just ask George Bush (16th paragraph).
So retainer practices will cherry-pick the patients who can afford to pay out of pocket for their care and leave those who are unable to afford it in a worse situation than before. Now not only will the indigent have little access to hospital services, they have even less access to primary care.

The influx of patients who must turn to the hospitals for routine care will in turn will put a bigger strain on an already overburdened system. Now not only are you waiting in line with the true emergencies in the emergency department, you’re waiting in line with the other poor souls who have no other means to receive health care. More roadblocks to care. Longer waits. More bad outcomes. When everything is an emergency, nothing is an emergency.

Each working citizen pays roughly 15% of his or her earnings to fund the Medicare system. I’ve been paying into the system for 20 years and haven’t used a dime of the money yet. By the time I’m ready to get the return on my “investment” what will be left?

I don’t know. I’m not sure I want to know. But I can tell you this … I’m glad that I’m a doctor.

Be careful what you ask for, THP, you just may get it.

7 Responses to “The Business Model Of Medicine – Part 2”

  1. First of all, reread my post. I never said this would apply to all specialties. I never said it would apply to hospitals or to emergency departments or radiologists or cardiologists. I never said that a cash-pay health care system would work, either. There is, however, a market for primary care physicians on a cash-pay basis. So, I stick by my comment.
    As for the pharmacies that refuse third party prescriptions, they get by with the SERVICES they provide, not the product they sell.

    I don’t know enough about the pharmacy industry to comment, but I am interested in a description of the services that pharmacists provide for which they receive payments from the patients. I understand that you can recommend medications, but that still results in a retail purchase, not the patient paying you for your advice.
    The issue I have with your comments is not personal. The issue is that so many people knowing little about the inner workings of the medical industry berate physicians for not fixing the problems. It isn’t that easy.
    The other side of the coin is that when physicians do “fix” the problem, and eventually they will, it ain’t going to be pretty.

  2. I actually agree with most of your rant, which is why I’m surprised that you have singled me out for disagreeing with one point of your argument. But thanks for the traffic! My best day so far!

    I’m not singling you out personally, but am rather singling out the notion that a solution to the health care crisis is as simple as physicians going “cash only.” The problem is multifaceted and not amenable to the rules of economics as those outside of medicine believe they know them.
    By encouraging physicians to go “cash only,” society will trade in one set of problems for a much more serious set of problems.

    P.S. I visited your blog also and you have some good stuff up. Keep it going!

  3. THP, I think the reason you were singled out is because many people have the mistaken idea that the great majority of MDs have a choice, when the reality is that they don’t, or they have very limited choices.

  4. DocBot said

    Hey, maybe Doctors Without Borders could come to the States and help you out? ;)

    I must say, I can’t really relate to your problems. Here in Sweden, more or less every doctor is salaried (at a _much_ lower rate than what any doctor earns in the states, but then again when I’m done I will owe $40k, not $140 – and I will also work less than you do over there). That said, you paint a bleak picture. Maybe I was wrong to put the smiley up there…

    I wish I only owed $140k …

  5. Julia said

    I did a month rotation in Kenya as a medical student, where it is exactly that, a cash only way of getting medical care. A patient could be admitted to the hospital without paying, but he couldn’t be discharged until his bill was paid, meaning we had beds of patients just sitting there for days and weeks, collecting more daily fees, waiting for a family member to sell their cows. If you want an xray, lab tests, CTOH, anything you have to pay for it, right there or you didn’t get it and believe me, it made practicing medicine very frustrating. I had more patients die on me while trying to scrounge up money to pay for the vitally needed test or medicine. If a patient died, the family couldn’t take the body home until the bill was settled. If the patient couldn’t afford it, well, you’d better hope that they had loving family members.

    Believe me, this is not the way that we want our medical care to go. I’m not sure where the solution lays, but I think rough times are ahead for all.

  6. anon said

    I almost totally agree with the content of your post, but I do think that “Most patients would rather pay nothing for medical care than pay a retainer fee for a doctor that knows them. Why do you think there is a constant flux of patients every time an employer changes insurance plans?” is not as simple as you make it out to be.

    When my workplace insurance changed such that I could not continue seeing a doctor that I really liked, I considered paying out of pocket for continued care. The problem with that was that all of the medical plans offered in some way centered around who my primary care physician was. If I was reasonably well, I was fine paying out of pocket. But what about if I wasn’t fine? If I needed an x-ray or a blood test? Then it was either pay out of pocket for those, or double up on the doctor visits (which adds co-pay on top of already paying the full fee of doctor #1). And how do you think my official insurance PCP would feel when I show up and say ‘my other doctor thinks I need a chest x-ray’ — even if they agree, why didn’t I just come see them in the first place? And what happens if they don’t agree on diagnostics and treatment with my preferred doctor? And the time sink — I’m a mom of two kids with a more-than-full-time job with a husband who is working full time and in grad school. Dealing with double doctor visits on top of being sick would make that even more complicated. At the end of the day, the gatekeeper function of a PCP makes it such that choosing to stay with a doctor who is not covered by your insurance doesn’t make sense unless you are really healthy and just need a checkup once a year, or wealthy enough to just pay out of pocket for all but the most catastrophic (>$10k) of events. And if you are that wealthy, you can probably have the option to go with a PPO that lets you see whoever you want anyway.

  7. anon said

    I also meant to add that if you are reasonably healthy, there isn’t *as* much incentive to stay with the doctor you like because ultimately you don’t see them much or for anyone significant. At that point, how much _is_ it worth to you to choose who gives you a new prescription for your inhaler every three years or if it’s the doctor you like or a random nurse practitioner you’ve never met who does your strep test?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>